Blog Contribution Guidelines

So you want to write for Making Learning Real Blog.

What we’re looking for

We want to change the way our readers teach, from the industrial age model of the last century to a problem-based case learning model in this century. We want to revolutionize how students become professionals and how professionals continue learning their trade utilizing Problem-Based Case Learning (PBCL).

If your article is about PBCL and applications of PBCL, we want to see it.

What we’re not looking for

The basic cornerstone of PBCL is the business partner. While we will publish articles addressing how the PBCL learning cycle is implemented in the classroom, preference will be given to articles that address engaging a business partner. This is central to the PBCL approach to teaching and learning.

We will also publish articles from elsewhere so long it is appropriately attributed and linked to and provides a fresh perspective or additional information to the original article.

How to write an article for MLR

Present a clear argument via a well-balanced structure while keeping our core readership of working web professionals in mind. Write boldly and in your own voice. Verify your information and cite sources when you need to.

How to submit an article for consideration

Please submit your article in Microsoft Word with linked text indicated in square brackets followed by the URL in parentheses to staff@makinglearningreal.org .

Why write for Making Learning Real?

Writing for Making Learning Real can move the state-of-the-art in teaching and learning. Hundreds of colleagues will see your work published in a credible and respected forum, and many will visit the links you include in your author bio.

One Response to Blog Contribution Guidelines

  1. Dale Doty says:

    Focus on Learning Outcomes, the content will come along with your activities.
    I think that experienced faculty often start thinking about PBCL from their usual approach to instruction. That usual approach generally focuses on the content elements of the course. If we can get faculty o consider the Learning Outcomes of the course they will have an easier time developing case files for inclusion in a course.
    The primary reason that I suggest this approach is that Learning Outcomes are generally broader in focus than are the content elements in a course. Initially case files tend to have a broad focus because the problems that industry will provide are going to require multiple skills and a variety of knowledge/experience to analyze. This is directly a result of the fact that the real/industrial world is not a topic/content focused world. Courses tend to be narrowly focused and are generally designed to involve one topic.
    The content elements will be part of the problem solution but may not be easily identified when the file is being developed. Faculty members will be able to recognize the content elements as the students work on the solution in their initial efforts to apply PBCL in their courses. With experience it is easier to identify the content elements when considering an industry problem. But, faculty will be more receptive to adopting PBCL if they focus on Learning Outcomes

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>